Judge Cacheris Grants GSK's and Tafas' Motions for Summary Judgement
From the order:
Because the USPTO’s rulemaking authority under 35 U.S.C. § 2(b)(2) does not extend to substantive rules, and because the Final Rules are substantive in nature, the Court
finds that the Final Rules are void as “otherwise not in accordance with law” and “in excess of statutory jurisdiction [and] authority.” 5 U.S.C. § 706(2).
Tafas%20v.%20Dudas%20%2801485532%29.pdf
Labels: GSK, Judge Cacheris, tafas, USPTO rule changes
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home