Amicus Briefs Filed in Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa
 Amicus briefs in support of the respondent or neither party were filed earlier this week in the en banc case Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa. Calling this case "important" to the future of design patent law in the U.S. is probably a gross understatement. Here is a link to the en banc order.  It could fundamentally change how design patent infringement and validity are considered, affecting wide sectors of American industry, from footwear to food.  Here is a link to the AIPLA's original brief filed in support of the petition for rehearing.  I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity to work with Kevin Kramer of Pillsbury Winthrop in connection with a brief we filed on behalf of the Federal Circuit bar Association.
Amicus briefs in support of the respondent or neither party were filed earlier this week in the en banc case Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa. Calling this case "important" to the future of design patent law in the U.S. is probably a gross understatement. Here is a link to the en banc order.  It could fundamentally change how design patent infringement and validity are considered, affecting wide sectors of American industry, from footwear to food.  Here is a link to the AIPLA's original brief filed in support of the petition for rehearing.  I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity to work with Kevin Kramer of Pillsbury Winthrop in connection with a brief we filed on behalf of the Federal Circuit bar Association. Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Federal%20Circuit%20Bar%20Association.pdf
Labels: Amicus Briefs, Egyptian Goddess v Swisa, FCBA, federal circuit bar association


 
    
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home