I reported
here about Microsoft's victory (by way of a favorable jury verdict finding two claims not infringed and invalid) in the Eastern District of Texas over Computer Acceleration Corp. (
CAC). That case involved alleged infringement of US Pat. No. 5,933,630, entitled "Program Launch Acceleration Using Ram Cache," which is a patent held by
CAC, a subsidiary of patent licensing giant,
Acacia. Well, the Judge apparently just made some post-verdict rulings on some outstanding issues (1) Microsoft's claim for a declaratory judgment for invalidity based on indefiniteness; (2) Microsoft's claim for a declaratory judgment counterclaim for
unenforceability based on inequitable conduct; and (3) Microsoft’s request for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. All three were denied
as reported by Mike Smith of McKool Smith. Check out Mike's blog for more details on the rulings. A published order is forthcoming and I will post that as soon as we have it.
Labels: Acacia, CAC, Microsoft, US Pat. No. 5933630
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home